Move to web apps reignites browser wars

PC and MAC news and discussions.

Move to web apps reignites browser wars

Postby crustyasp46 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:15 pm

Move to web apps reignites browser wars

Remember the browser wars of the late 1990s? They're back, and they're bigger and badder than ever.
You could turn it into a film, in fact: Microsoft takes on the plucky Netscape and kills it to death, but Netscape's son Mozilla vows that one day, he will get his revenge - so he bides his time, recruits an army that includes the famous warriors Google, Opera and Apple, gets tooled up and challenges Microsoft to a rematch.

Well, it's a bit like that, anyway - and this time, it's all about apps.

At this week's Mix conference in Las Vegas, Microsoft unveiled a preview of IE10 - and it did so with some controversial claims. Apparently IE9 delivers "the most native HTML5 experience and the best web experience on Windows", a claim that's caused Opera's Haavard Moen to respond: "HTML5 is not native. It is not supposed to be native".

Marketing claims aside, browser development is speeding up. It seems as if Google's updated Chrome every time we open it, and Firefox has moved to a speedier development cycle in order to compete. And of course the paint was barely dry on IE9 when Microsoft started talking about IE10.

Faster release cycles

Microsoft may be taking potshots at Chrome over its constant stream of updates - faster releases "just means bigger version numbers and more updates of incomplete standards," Microsoft's Dean Hachamovitch told Mix delegates - but Microsoft's speedier release plans show that it's taking Chrome very seriously.

As TechRadar writer Mary Branscombe points out, IE10 is part of a bigger picture. "IE10 is trying, like IE9, to straddle the two worlds of open, ever-evolving web standards and the power in Windows that makes you want to use the operating system." As the IE10 platform preview demonstrates, it's all about apps.

The original browser wars occurred because Netscape had a vision: the web would make traditional operating systems obsolete.

That scared Microsoft silly in the 1990s, but it's embracing the idea now. Microsoft is positioning IE - and by extension, Windows 8 - as the best platform for running web apps, and it's doing so partly because Google's Chrome OS - a browser that's also an operating system - is on the horizon.

On the face of it, pushing any platform as "best for web apps" seems silly: the kerfuffle over "native HTML5" is because HTML is supposed to be device and platform independent: it should deliver the same experience no matter what you access it on.

Different approaches

In reality, though, there are differences between the browsers: different levels of standards support, different levels of performance, different approaches to security, and different levels of operating system integration - so for example IE9's (and 10's) integration with the Windows Taskbar means that web apps can seem more Windows-like, and IE's hardware acceleration can make a big difference to application performance on suitable hardware.

The more software moves from the desktop to the browser, the more crucial such differentiation will become.

In an increasingly app-y world, getting us to think "Windows" when we see web apps is essential for Microsoft. Unlike Google, which doesn't really care how we get online as long as we're seeing and clicking Google ads when we do, Microsoft has a software business to protect.

If web apps look the same, act the same and perform the same on any platform, who needs Windows?

The worry for some is that IE may once again be EEE - that is, "embrace, extend and extinguish", Microsoft's famous strategy for clobbering the competition.

We've been here before: Microsoft embraced the idea of the browser, extended it and then extinguished Netscape, and it promptly shuttered browser development for the best part of a decade. Microsoft's rivals are keen to stop that particular bit of history from repeating.

Source: Tech Radar

Web apps is not a new concept, for replacing or supplementing an OS. a fine read about the concept would require a search of gOS operating system , or a search on the Everex gPC, (the $199.00 PC that sold out stock in 2007). Both related items.

Google has been doing web apps for ages. And again, Microsoft in desperation is in catch up mode, and doing the Microsoft sales pitch, outlandish claims of superiority. If Microsoft were to put as much effort into quality, as they seem to do with scheming to destroy competition, I believe that the product could then stand on the quality opposed to the quality being the never ending thorn in Microsoft's. side. crusty.
User avatar
crustyasp46
He's Everyones Daddy
He's Everyones Daddy
Next LVL Up at : 1750
Next LVL Up at : 1750
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:06 pm
Has thanked: 2653 times
Been thanked: 1006 times

Re: Move to web apps reignites browser wars

Postby te_lanus » Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:24 pm

Just a sad part is that IE9 still doesn't work with M$ products, and M$ knows it. For the Business they run M$ Outlook web interface, It works with Firefox and Chrome, but not on IE6.1-IE9. M$ told us that they know it doesn't work but they have no intention to fix it.
Image
User avatar
te_lanus
Unlimited Member
Unlimited Member
Next LVL Up at : 670
Next LVL Up at : 670
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:02 pm
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 315 times
Fav System: Everything 1980-2000

Re: Move to web apps reignites browser wars

Postby Rhodderz » Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:45 pm

PAH IE10 native for web apps, if its anything like ie 9 (and pretty much EVERYTHING below it) then it sucks, as i have seen with IE it get worst. my IE decided to randomly change, i got suspicious had a look, click Internet Explorer 9........."Windows has encountered an error and needs to shut down". hasnt worked since and for when it is working (runs on my lappy) well i think poorrly doesnt cut it, tried running a video and it ate more CPU than firefox on happy pills. now for chrom, it runs pretty damn good but then the core of it is Firefox, and firefox, well is firefox, it works well, does what you want and has a hisy fit now and then. With HTML 5 though
IE 9: didnt want to run any HTML 5 at all (dont know if it is supported)
FireFox and Chrome: didt actually find any problems (uses less cpu and ram than flash anyhow)
opera: not tried
but then this is microsoft they try and jump before learning to run at least walking, they should fix what doesnt work in the first place and stop making STUPID mistakes (like maby putting a BLANK Windows 7 activation certificate in the Release Candidate) yes i like windows 7 but the amount of mistakes and shit that microsoft pull out as well will make a dung beetle thinks its a holiday with a free bar :P but thats my rant over. when microsoft stop steeling things from other people (as IE9 seems to have a few Firefox chunks in it and the MBR has chunks from GRUB (linux boot process) makes Microsoft look like Proffesor Frankenstein :P )ill be happy :P
Also for stupid ignorant arseholes who probably will read this Apple macs ARE GREAT for what they do, which is MEDIA. now im off to bed :P
Case: Antec Dark Fleet DF-85 Case
Board: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R v2
CPU: i7 950 3.20GHz HyperThreaded (safley 3.90GHz)
RAM: Corsair XMS3 2GB x 6 =12GB (DDR3 1600)
Network: Bigfoot 2100
PSU: Thermaltake TR2-420W
Graphics Card: GTX 460
HDD's:
HDD1: OS/Programs 300GB
HDD2: Games/Downloads 2TB
Disc Drive: LG DVD+-RW LS Dual-Layer
Keyboard: logitech G19
Mouse: Microsoft Sidewinder X8
User avatar
Rhodderz
Unlimited Member
Unlimited Member
Next LVL Up at : 25
Next LVL Up at : 25
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Cornwall, England
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times
Fav System: PC, Snes,(XBMC), 360, PSP


Return to Modern Computing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

cron